Beth Mansfield Illinois Play It Again Sports
Run into a Problem?
Thanks for telling us well-nigh the problem.
Friend Reviews
Community Reviews
The hero and heroine are brother/sister in-laws that do Not become along. They are the epitome of oil and water. The heroine's sister is terminally ill and dies in the middle of the story. Heroine and hero are forced together as she tries to assistance the children ove
This was definitely an uncomfortable, but interesting read. I enjoyed it because the author actually pushed the envelope and made no apologies for it. Information technology besides was well written and kept me engaged even though there were times that I shuddered.The hero and heroine are blood brother/sister in-laws that do Not get along. They are the epitome of oil and water. The heroine's sis is terminally ill and dies in the center of the story. Heroine and hero are forced together every bit she tries to aid the children overcome their grief at the loss of their female parent.
In spite of the fact that I really enjoyed this book, there are some major issues, so proceed with caution: (view spoiler)[ * Hero blatantly commits adultery, keeping "a mistress, on the side. Nosotros later detect out that this is because his wife shut him off all marital relations due to a terminal illness. Instead of telling him the truth, she decides it'due south meliorate to merely let him call back she is no longer interested in the sexual side of marriage. (I didn't go the logic on that i) The story opens with the heroine catching the hero kissing his mistress in broad daylight in London, while she is riding in a coach with her sister. * The hero does not know his wife is dying until her expiry bed. He never spends much time at his country estate, where wife and children really live. He prefers the passion of the London political scene, and his mistress. * Hero is devastated when his wife dies and BLAMES the heroine for not telling him his wife was so ill. Even though her sister made her promise never to tell the Hero. (Didn't get that 1 either. If he would have spent time with his family, he would accept seen how desperately sick his wife was) * Heroine was too one-dimensional. She matured profoundly in the story, but there were times that her "approach" to life'southward bug just irritated me. * Marrying your sis-in law in 1810 was a major taboo. In 1837 a law was invoked that preclude information technology. So these two were headed for a life of misery and social discord. (hide spoiler)]
I never was convinced of their HEA. He actually was an arrogant, self-centered individual who never quite redeemed himself. Though he did get meliorate, unfortunately not plenty to wipe the slate clean and not enough to forgive him and wish for a HEA. I never saw the man of "character" that anybody else saw.
If you're looking for a very dissimilar regency romance, and so I would highly recommend this i. If 1 of my spoilers, is a showstopper for you, then avoid this one at all cost.
...more
Didn't actually enjoy this one because of several bug.
1.The pb male person character - I tin't phone call him the "hero" - is adulterous, arrogant, rude, insensitive and basically needs to be bashed on the caput multiple times before he sees that he is an donkey.
ii. The male lead is almost twice the age of the heroine (35 to 20), and at least 4 times her age in worldly experience. It's hard to see a happy ending in this situation.
iii. The male person pb is a dyed-in-the-wo
Elizabeth Mansfield'south "The Fifth Kiss"Didn't really enjoy this i considering of several problems.
1.The lead male character - I can't telephone call him the "hero" - is adulterous, big-headed, rude, insensitive and basically needs to be bashed on the caput multiple times before he sees that he is an ass.
two. The male person lead is almost twice the age of the heroine (35 to 20), and at least iv times her historic period in worldly experience. It's hard to come across a happy catastrophe in this state of affairs.
three. The male lead is a dyed-in-the-wool Tory and influential member of the government - politics is his life's work - while the heroine is a reformer and Whig. I come across virtually no hope of a happy catastrophe in this aspect. (Tory = Republican, Whig = Democrat in today's politics in America.)
4. The heroine is the much younger sister of the male atomic number 82's first wife. At the time this story happens (1811), marrying the sister of your deceased wife was not illegal, only I detect it hard to believe that information technology would be an adequate thing to exercise at that time given that only 24 years subsequently it was fabricated ILLEGAL past an Act of Parliament! (This was rescinded in the early 20'thursday century.) And so in that location must take been an unwritten rule against it, even if information technology was not yet illegal, in 1811 - you lot can't change society'southward rules around by 180 degrees, from complete acceptance to illegality, in so short a time. For this reason I see admittedly no possibility of a happy ending for this couple - they would accept lost a lot of social credence by their marriage, if non existence completely ostracized.
On the other paw, the story is interesting and I couldn't put information technology downward until I had read the whole thing.
Funny how rules of consanguinity in union have changed over the years - in 1811 marriage between first cousins was accepted and quite mutual amid the rich (to go on the money in the family) but today we retrieve it's rather disgusting, while today we don't take any objections to a widow or widower marrying their dead spouse's brother or sis.
...more
Large giant plot revealing spoiler!
Whoredog hero and sister-in-police force heroine. Lots of foot-stomping fun...well...a fiddling. I'm 1 of the few who understood the hero's whorey means and forgave him. (view spoiler)[You cut a dude off, he'll find'im some elsewhere. Though, I hold that not telling the H you have a ferocious fatal vaginal illness in the first place is a stupid plot point. (hide spoiler)] I was hoping for more than wtfery but was sufficiently satisfied.
3.5 starsBig behemothic plot revealing spoiler!
Whoredog hero and sis-in-law heroine. Lots of foot-stomping fun...well...a little. I'thousand ane of the few who understood the hero's whorey ways and forgave him. (view spoiler)[You cutting a dude off, he'll discover'im some elsewhere. Though, I agree that not telling the H you take a ferocious fatal vaginal disease in the offset identify is a stupid plot point. (hide spoiler)] I was hoping for more than wtfery merely was sufficiently satisfied.
...more than
The only gripping part is at the very beginning and once that'southward washed, it's all tea, governesses, and old ladies in turbans. No i gets laid, there's no scheming mistress and no interesting villain.
Information technology's clean, in that location'due south more than bickering than romance and about of it is people talking about having tea.The only gripping part is at the very beginning and one time that'due south done, information technology's all tea, governesses, and one-time ladies in turbans. No one gets laid, in that location's no scheming mistress and no interesting villain.
...more
And there's Clara, slowly dying, four years into the life of the 2nd child.
[I classed this nether cheating hero because he
And in that location'southward Clara, slowly dying, 4 years into the life of the 2d child.
[I classed this under adulterous hero considering he was adulterous on his first wife; doesn't matter that she was complaisant about information technology, however painfully]
I similar the author and her story telling. Merely the situation between the H/h is then contrived. If the author has to impale off a perfectly prissy character for H,h to be together, it'south not something that'll make me happy reading. And what's with telling the kids that mama is in heaven and tin run into her. That just makes them more confused and agitated.
The H calls his married woman's sister (the h) a meddling busybody and berates her for not meddling more. Obviously she should have told him her sis was dying. What almost him? Should he have had to rely on someone telling him that? Could he non have cared plenty about his wife to see that? To talk to her doctor? What doctor would not have told the husband if his wife was and so seriously damaged?
H is a cocky-centered brick. Just hey, he'south a political mover and shaker, has tons of coin, has a title, so allow's just forgive him for treating his first married woman and his son shamefully, because he simply didn't know.
Autonomously from the male person MC, I liked the other characters. But and then, stories virtually unrakish, decent, caring men are so uninspired. Have the h's blood brother Charles, who ends up with the children's governess Elspeth. Theirs is the (tiny) secondary romance, wrapped upwardly and done in a few paragraphs. I even liked Leonora, whom the H brought, along with her family unit to Langley, to get acquainted with his children before officially getting betrothed. I didn't like the H or his martyrdom in marrying then that the h could exist gratis to pursue her life. Didn't he condemn his married woman's wish to do the aforementioned?
Nosotros're told that Miles is a man of honor (quite a few times), but he comes beyond as an insensitive, unfeeling, uncaring fauna and isn't redeemed enough for me to like him. Too little, too late.
What's the apply of a well written tale if information technology doesn't life my spirits. I should probably stop reading Elizabeth Mansfield :(.
The championship comes from the h trying to figure out things such as kissing and 'feelings', and finds it bewildering that she liked her blood brother-in-police force's drunken buss ameliorate than the other 3 kisses that she'southward had, when she doesn't even like him (early), and that isn't consistent with her theory that kisses are thrilling if you love that person. I guess I didn't keep rails correctly, the 5th buss is was not the H.
...more
Regencies/romances in general always seem
Kind of your standard regency and the writing is better than most. I wasn't bothered by Mile'south sleeping with a low-cal-skirt; I was more bothered by Clara'south (Mile's first wife and Olivia's sister) keeping (view spoiler)[ her illness (hide spoiler)]a cloak-and-dagger from him and pushing him away without giving him a reason. Evidently Clara and Miles were very much in beloved and had a not bad relationship in the kickoff, then keeping secrets like that didn't really fit.Regencies/romances in general ever seem to go: he says A, she hears B, so she does C, and he does D in reaction, until E happens, then he explains A and they live happily always later. Simply hither we accept a secondary character deed equally the get-between and sort things out earlier they got explosive, which was So refreshing.
I'yard usually into the whole detest-turns-to-love trope, and at that place was some nice tension here, and you lot could run across some human relationship development...just all I could think about was "his d*ck has been inside of your dead sister...and now information technology's going to be within yous CHILLS BARF"
It'due south a quick, piece of cake, read.
...more
It is not romantic to kiss your brother-in-law who is likewise married to your sister. (This isn't a spoiler, it's literally the summary for this volume.)
And they fight CONSTANTLY. I don't intendance if they're good for each other. Who wants to spend all day every day fighting?!
Ugh.
*I skimmed the last one-half. NO. No, no no no no no.
It is not romantic to kiss your brother-in-police who is as well married to your sister. (This isn't a spoiler, it's literally the summary for this volume.)
And they fight CONSTANTLY. I don't intendance if they're good for each other. Who wants to spend all day every twenty-four hours fighting?!
Ugh.
*I skimmed the terminal half. ...more
I know nada about English law at the turn of the 19th c. However; the book seems to have a like plot to Heath's The Earl Takes All. In that (which I oasis't read) I idea the problem was that the hero couldn't legally ally his brother's widow because it was considered incest (or something similar that). Hither we accept a widower who wants to marry his SIL. It merely doesn't seem right and leaves an uncomfortable tast
This was a weird ane. Non that that'southward bad - information technology'south good to have an unusual plot.I know nothing virtually English law at the plow of the 19th c. However; the volume seems to have a like plot to Heath's The Earl Takes All. In that (which I haven't read) I idea the trouble was that the hero couldn't legally ally his brother's widow because it was considered incest (or something like that). Hither we have a widower who wants to marry his SIL. It but doesn't seem right and leaves an uncomfortable taste in my mouth.
Somehow, I thought the dead wife/sis was going to bring them both together before she died and the rest of the book would be well-nigh them coming to terms with their feelings for each other and the expressionless wife/sis'south wishes and getting over the "ick, nosotros're sort of related" factor. And while that was sort of the case regarding their feelings, neither widower or sister had whatever qualms about marrying once they confessed their feelings for each other.
I'1000 about to read up on English police force. Sky assistance me.
I've read. Information technology seems that while information technology was considered incest, at the time there wasn't a law prohibiting it. However; if information technology happened and someone objected, the marriage was considered void. It wasn't outright prohibited until 1835 in the Uk & colonies simply the marriages were recognized if conducted abroad.
Equally to the H & h they were a mixed bag. I both liked and disliked them at different times in the volume. Sort of like real people who I tin can both like and find annoying simultaneously. I do think that while Olivia was younger, she eventually acted more than grown-upwards than Miles.
Miles' infidelity becomes a nonissue once Clara becomes more than ill. I constitute Clara to be worse than either H or h. If Olivia hadn't deliberately defied her, Miles wouldn't accept made it dorsum before she died. I had no problem with the age gap and at least Olivia tried to educate herself to the extent she could in male person-female relationships. She certain every bit heck knew Miles' kiss affected her more than the other 3 "suitors".
...more than
A sweetness regency (published in 1981), and I actually enjoyed the romance. Not sure I was entirely comfortable with some of the underlying messages - she marries him to wait later on his children, vi months later on the wife/her sis died, just at the same fourth dimension I did believe in the romance.
I've a soft spot for Elizabeth Mansfield and ended upwardly buyi
This ane had a massively intriguing dorsum cover blurb - the heroine kissing her blood brother-in-police. How does the author redeem both the heroine and hero after that?A sweet regency (published in 1981), and I really enjoyed the romance. Non sure I was entirely comfortable with some of the underlying messages - she marries him to look afterwards his children, six months afterward the wife/her sis died, but at the same time I did believe in the romance.
I've a soft spot for Elizabeth Mansfield and concluded upwards ownership quite a few off Better Globe Books over Christmas - I'm glad I've a few more to read!
...more
Mi chiedo, però, se il mio giudizio un po' troppo positivo not sia stato influenzato dalla gran quantità di 'rubbish' in cui mi sono imbattuta negli ultimi tempi. Una storia molto più ricca di tensione di quelle in genere scritte da Dorothy Mack; ma, in generale, una buona storia, anche se il capovolgimento di fronte dei due ex nemici sembra nel complesso un po' troppo repentino...
Mi chiedo, però, se il mio giudizio un po' troppo positivo non sia stato influenzato dalla gran quantità di 'rubbish' in cui mi sono imbattuta negli ultimi tempi. ...more
A difficult plot that started from hate and moved to love. The children'southward characters are beautifully drawn as is the naivete of the heroine.
She pulled information technology offA difficult plot that started from detest and moved to dear. The children's characters are beautifully drawn equally is the naivete of the heroine.
...more
Wedlock between a widower and his deceased wife's sis did happen prior to the the 1835 Act of Parliament. A well-known example: Rear Admiral Charles John Austen, married his deceased wife's sister in 1820; lst wife died 1814. The 1835 Deed was passed in order to protect the rights of inheritance of a son of a Duke; the Act st Several reviewers take commented on the age differences (and differences in points of view) and on the author's inaccuracy of having a widower marrying his wife's sister:
Union betwixt a widower and his deceased wife'south sister did happen prior to the the 1835 Act of Parliament. A well-known example: Rear Admiral Charles John Austen, married his deceased wife's sister in 1820; lst wife died 1814. The 1835 Act was passed in social club to protect the rights of inheritance of a son of a Duke; the Act stated that such marriages (between a widower and his deceased wife'south sis) already in being would continue to be legal, but subsequent marriages would not. There was much discussion near the Act, both pro and con, based on religious, biological, etc. reasons. How much it affected those of the lower classes information technology is hard to say; they may have continued to contract such "marriages" without benefit of clergy. I practical reason for such a marriage is that the widower might expect that his sis-in-law would care for her nieces and nephews more than kindly than a not-related stride-mother would. Clearly people would react to such marriages as they pleased. I think one friend of my female parent's seeking mom's counsel when the friend's widowed brother-in-law and she were thinking of marrying, and this was in the 1950's. As far as political views go: nosotros accept today in politics some prominent examples of dyed-in-the-wool Republicans and Democrats happily married. As far every bit the difference in age goes, married people close in age are not always happy in the marriages, as our electric current divorce charge per unit shows, and I have known a number of happy /content marriages with age differences of twenty years or more. It all depends on the individuals involved. ...more
However I'm feeling very conflicted regarding this volume. There'south no doubt this is quite well written, and realistic, too. Olivia is a bluestocking, merely non the impossibly feisty (and sometimes downright rude) type. Miles is a man of character, but just within the bounds of the morals of the time. They take flaws and they acquire to temper it without authour pointedly announcing EPIPHANY! every time. Plot is not as well contrived. So, yeah, this was a cut higher up the usual traditional regencies yous meet.
Nevertheless, it wasn't an piece of cake read. Non just was I disturbed by their human relationship (I don't retrieve information technology was even legal back then), merely the overall temper was simply too painful. Olivia'due south finding out the adultery, her sister's expiry, frustrated at Miles for both beingness and so right but so wrong, just everything seemed so gloomy and stifling that I felt like crying at times. Mayhap this is an evidence of the author's good skill. Had the characters been more than perfect, more than to the taste of modern readers, it would accept been a very comfy read(and to be quickly forgotten). But it wouldn't accept felt then real, I suppose. ...more than
Elizabeth Mansfield is the pen name of the talented Paula Reibel Schwartz. Ms Schwartz besides wrote different genres under the pen names Paula Reibel, Paula Reid, and Paula Jonas.
News & Interviews
Welcome back. Simply a moment while we sign you in to your Goodreads account.
howardmiturnenings.blogspot.com
Source: https://www.goodreads.com/book/show/3051324-the-fifth-kiss
0 Response to "Beth Mansfield Illinois Play It Again Sports"
Post a Comment